Intelligence chief Dan Coats says the United States is ‘under attack’ by Vladimir Putin who continues to use our media to spread lies and half-truths as a way to sow division between Americans.
What does this look like for everyday users of Twitter and Facebook?
There are thousands of bots posing as Liberal/Resistance accounts on twitter simultaneously sending the same scripted tweets.
On first glance the tweets look benign.
The tweets are emotional, inflammatory, and divisive.
They use Putin’s standard strategy of telling a half truth as in above tweet
about the death of Muhiydin Moye.
Yes, Muhiydin Moye was shot and killed in New Orléans, but there is no evidence the shooting was related to his activism as the tweet implies.
Here’s the full story on CNN:
“An adult black male, identified as Mr. Muhiydin Moye, sustained a gunshot wound to the thigh in a shooting incident that occurred shortly before 1:30 am on February 6th. He was transported to a hospital and subsequently died of his wounds,” NOPD spokesman Beau Tidwell said in an email.
An attorney for the police department said that the incident report citing aggravated battery was the only one available, and that “the signal was recently changed to a homicide.”
The suspect is an unknown stranger, according to the incident report.Calling him “Moya,” Camille Weaver, Moye’s cousin, said on the GoFundMe page that the family received a call Tuesday morning “saying that he had died due to excessive blood loss. We don’t have many details, but will update as soon as we do.”
This tweet tells us that a White Christian Extremist was busted while planning a major terror attack:
I checked and found no story about the bust of a ‘Christian extremist’ dated February 10.
The bots never tweet about TrumpRussia.
I scrolled through at least 50 accounts and didn’t see a single tweet about Putin, the Russian attack on the US election or Mueller’s investigation.
The bots do tweet about Trump’s distractions:
They cite legitimate news outlets in these tweets but don’t link to the articles.
There are other ‘tells’ but none is as weird as seeing different accounts with profile pictures of the same woman shot from different angles.
Cindy Rebala is Stacy Roland
Stacy Roland is Kyle Rosemary
Kyle Rosemary is Lizza Simmon
It’s so weird and diabolical that it’s hard to believe this is happening in life.
Cincinnati political science professor, Dr. Richard Harknett said in testimony before the House Armed Services Committee about Russian cyber operations, “…We are facing comprehensive strategic campaigns to undermine our national sources of power.”
Briteny Alonso is Sasha Mathew
‘Angel-bots, you’re going under cover; stupid cover, but this is Moscow.’
Rob Goldstein 2018 (all images are twitter screenshots and are presented here for educational purposes)
Most people recognize this famous question even if they don’t know it came from Howard Baker, a Senate Republican and a close friend to then President Richard Nixon.
What’s forgotten today is Baker thought he was protecting Nixon with that line. He was attempting to wall off the president from the actions of aides who might have done something wrong.
“He evidently meant to exculpate Nixon from prior knowledge of the break-in,” wrote historian Fred Emery in his book “Watergate: The Corruption of American Politics and the Fall of Richard Nixon.”
But Dean turned this question around. Among other things, he charged that Nixon had been involved in discussions about clemency for those who had carried out and organized the break-ins, as well as talks about payoffs. Dean said the president had continued these activities even after he, as White House counsel, had warned his boss of a “cancer” on the presidency.
Nixon had already denied all these things. It was his word against Dean’s. In that standoff the president might well have won the benefit of the doubt from the Senate and the US people.
Then in early July, another Nixon aide revealed to the panel the existence of the White House tapes. A record existed that could prove whether Nixon or Dean was right.
At that point, Baker continued to press, not for Nixon’s advantage, but for the truth. His careful and detailed questioning won him widespread national attention and praise.
In the real world an overwhelming amount of verified public evidence suggests the President and all of his men are guilty of conspiring to subvert the rule of law and polls show a majority of Americans believe that Trump has committed a crime.
Consider this January 26, 2018 statement from Dianne Feinstein in which she observes that Trump doesn’t respect the rule of law or the Constitution.
Trump’s disdain for the law is such a given it’s as if Feinstein is dishing a bad choice of tie: “…too bad trump needs to have what looks like a long red tongue dangling between his legs. ”
It may be comforting to compare TrumpRussia to Watergate but the two scandals are not alike; Watergate was an attempt to rig an election by stealing documents and illegally recording the DNC; TrumpRussia is an ongoing conspiracy to subvert the government of the United States of America.
If the Watergate Scandal was a cancer on the Presidency, TrumpRussia is a flesh-eating bacteria.
Russian Propaganda is gaslighting; a form of psychological abuse designed to make you doubt what you know.
This timeline covers stories that broke before election day 2016.
So, what do we know about Trump and TrumpRussia?
We knew as early as 2014 that Putin was financing an army of trained propagandists: The Kremlin’s Troll Army.
We knew Putin’s army is trained and vicious:
‘Trolling covers a multitude of sins but a particularly nasty strain has emerged in the midst of the armed conflict in Ukraine, which infests comment threads on the Guardian and elsewhere, despite the best efforts of moderators. Readers and reporters alike are concerned that these are from those paid to troll, and to denigrate in abusive terms anyone criticizing Russia or President Vladimir Putin.”
Every day at the Internet Research Agency was essentially the same, Savchuk told me. The first thing employees did upon arriving at their desks was to switch on an Internet proxy service, which hid their I.P. addresses from the places they posted; those digital addresses can sometimes be used to reveal the real identity of the poster. Savchuk would be given a list of the opinions she was responsible for promulgating that day. Workers received a constant stream of “technical tasks” — point-by-point exegeses of the themes they were to address, all pegged to the latest news. Ukraine was always a major topic, because of the civil war there between Russian-backed separatists and the Ukrainian Army; Savchuk and her co-workers would post comments that disparaged the Ukrainian president, Petro Poroshenko, and highlighted Ukrainian Army atrocities. Russian domestic affairs were also a major topic. Last year, after a financial crisis hit Russia and the ruble collapsed, the professional trolls left optimistic posts about the pace of recovery. Savchuk also says that in March, after the opposition leader Boris Nemtsov was murdered, she and her entire team were moved to the department that left comments on the websites of Russian news outlets and ordered to suggest that the opposition itself had set up the murder. The New York Times, The Agency
We knew as early as June 2016 that Putin was using this army of paid propagandists to support Trump’s run for President.
In August of 2016 we learned that Trump was being sued for fraud:
August 2016 we learned that Trump’s campaign manager, Paul Manafort, was under investigation for his activities in the Ukraine
“I want to know what money he got from a pro-Russian organization in the Ukraine,” Rep. Sean Duffy of Wisconsin told CNN’s Chris Cuomo on Tuesday.
In August of 2016 Democratic Senator Harry Reid was so concerned about Russian election tampering he called for an FBI investigation:
In a letter to the F.B.I. Director, James B. Comey Jr., Mr. Reid wrote that the threat of Russian interference “is more extensive than is widely known and may include the intent to falsify official election results.” Recent classified briefings from senior intelligence officials, Mr. Reid said in an interview, have left him fearful that President Vladimir V. Putin’s “goal is tampering with this election.” The New York Times
In that letter to FBI Director James Comey we learn that former Director of Central Intelligence, Michael Morell viewed Trump as an unwitting agent of Russia and the Kremlin:
On October 3, 2016 we hear reports that Putin is trying to compromise Trump:
This material is known as the Steele Dossier.
We’ve known since January of 2017 that Christopher Steele’s was first hired by Republicans for opposition research into Trump and later by the Democrats.
This was widely reported.
Fusion GPS had been hired by Republican opponents of Mr Trump in September 2015. In June 2016, Mr Steele came on the team. He was, and continues to be, highly regarded in the intelligence world.
In July, Mr Trump won the Republican nomination and the Democrats became new employers of Mr Steele and Fusion GPS. In the same month, Mr Steele produced a memo, which went to the FBI, stating that Mr Trump’s campaign team had agreed to a Russian request to dilute attention on Moscow’s intervention in Ukraine.
Four days later, Mr Trump stated that he would recognise Moscow’s annexation of Crimea. Officials involved in his campaign had already asked the Republican party’s election platform to remove a pledge for military assistance to the Ukrainian government against separatist rebels in the east of the country.
Mr Steele claimed that the Trump campaign was taking this path because it was aware that the Russians were hacking Democratic Party emails. No evidence of this has been made public, but the same day that Mr Trump spoke about Crimea he called on the Kremlin to hack Hillary Clinton’s emails. The UK Independent
October 12, CNN reports that Federal Law Enforcement officials have reason to
believe Florida’s voting machines were hacked by Russia:
October 3rd The Access Hollywood Tape is released:
October 12, reports surface that a woman who claims Trump raped her when
she was 13 has a court date:
A judge has ordered a status conference hearing into a lawsuit submitted by a woman who claims Donald Trump raped her when she was 13-years-old in 1994.
Federal Judge Ronnie Abrams has ordered the hearing for 16 December in a New York court. She has asked for both sides to provide information to assist the Court in advancing the case to settlement or trial. The Independent
November 09, Putin celebrates Trump’s ‘win’.
This timeline does not include everything that we knew prior to the night of the
election but all of it is public information and every bit of it can be cross checked across multiple media outlets.
I also chose to use the British press to illustrate that these were widely reported stories.
Don’t let Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump play gaslight with you.
The only conspiracy is the one we can see with our own eyes.
Rob Goldstein 2018
From Louise Mensch